An article was recently released, “On BAPism and Christianity”; do you see now, the siren song of ‘Nietzschian Christianity’? The Devil, perhaps, doesn’t tempt – but, much like feminism, merely points out a real problem and offers a false solution. The problems are real. But is a growing paganism really a solution? Why does it seem so tempting? Why doesn’t anyone else seem to be offering a solution to the very real problems described? This is the key point.
Beauty and the Beast might be the best traditionalist story dealing with the problem of marriage and women, even in its modern animated form – which is the only form I’ll be dealing with, as the original lacks Gaston. Most people who talk about Gaston, particularly women, pretend they are Belle – or that Belle represents all women – and that Gaston is some kind of anti-woman patriarchal demon behind an attractive mask. Clearly this isn’t the case – in fact, central to his character is his nearly ubiquitous female appeal; women want Gaston, and to pretend they’re all oblivious to his character, or that Belle’s refusal was even tied to character, is childish. Is there something to say about both this obvious fact, and the modern unwillingness to apprehend it?
What an awful idea. Only a monster would believe something like this. Why do we have to subordinate anyone, let alone women as a group? But over the long years of women’s suffrage and legal equality, have women demonstrated a desire to be equals? Or simply a desire to be given equality? Furthermore, what have women done with that equality? What’s the status of our heterosexual (reproductive) relationships? What can be said about the happiness of men, and women, in our society now that women have their so-called freedom? This is the key point.
When you browse certain websites, ones with, for example, a socially dangerous ideological reinforcement system, you run across all sorts of insanity: excuses, actually – look at all the men killing themselves, it’s their fault. But never mind the particulars, I was curious about why they don't see how crazy they’re being? Honestly this type of insanity set me down the path to something like reaction, but they seem to believe it, in earnest. Why?
Is liberty sacred? Anyone indoctrinated under the current worldview would I suppose, like the Aztec’s belief in human sacrifice, will either explicitly or implicitly agree with this belief. But what do we mean when we say liberty? This is towards a question I believe I've asked already, but what do we mean when we say we’re free? Free do what, exactly? Whatever we want, is the oft-given answer. Free to follow our animal instincts, obviously – or, if we’re rational actors – if we’re machines – we’ll work towards reasonable ends. But who thinks like a machine? Who wants to think like a machine? More importantly, is a machine ever free? This is the key point.